Erasmus+ Programme Guide 2025 vs 2026

The European Commission has published the Erasmus+ Programme Guide 2026, introducing targeted updates while maintaining overall continuity with the 2025 framework. This post breaks down the key differences between the two guides — covering priorities, actions, structural adjustments, and budget — so your organisation can quickly understand what has changed and how it affects your next application.

If you are preparing a proposal for a 2026 deadline, this comparison gives you the essential context to align your project with the latest programme expectations.


High-Level Programme Orientation

Area 2025 Guide 2026 Guide What Changed
Strategic EU linkages European Education Area, Digital Education Action Plan, EU Youth Strategy, EU Work Plan for Sport Same, plus explicit support for the Union of Skills initiative and EU Preparedness Union Strategy New political alignment in 2026
Ukraine-related support Support to refugees, learners, staff and organisations affected by the Russian invasion Same focus, wording updated Terminology update — policy continuity
Overall objectives Lifelong learning, mobility, inclusion, innovation, European identity Same No change

Horizontal Priorities

Horizontal priorities run across all Key Actions and should be reflected in your proposal’s objectives, activities, and impact sections. Here is what changed between 2025 and 2026.

Priority Area 2025 2026 Difference
Inclusion & diversity Focus on fewer opportunities, migrants, rural areas, gender inequality, Ukrainian refugees Same scope, plus explicit reference to mental health and preparedness Expanded framing
Green transition Sustainability competences, green sector skills, New European Bauhaus Same No change
Digital transformation Digital readiness, AI, digital pedagogy, disinformation, digital well-being Same No change
Civic engagement / EU values Participation in democratic life, EU awareness, Youth Participation Strategy Same, adds preparedness and resilience Broader societal framing

Structure of Key Actions

Key Action 2025 2026 Difference
KA1 — Learning Mobility Same set of mobility actions Same No structural change
KA2 — Cooperation Partnerships for Cooperation, Excellence, Innovation, Capacity Building Same categories, plus European Partnerships for School Development New sub-action in 2026
KA3 — Policy Support European Youth Together; Jean Monnet Same No change

KA2 Notable Change — European Partnerships for School Development

The most significant structural addition in the 2026 guide is the introduction of European Partnerships for School Development under KA2 Cooperation. This new action line focuses specifically on school education cooperation at European level — expanding opportunities for schools and education authorities to collaborate across borders.

If your organisation works in school education, this is worth examining closely as a new funding route that did not exist in 2025.


Partnerships for Excellence

Sub-action 2025 2026 Change
Centres of Vocational Excellence No change
Erasmus+ Teacher Academies Removed as standalone line
Erasmus Mundus Action No change

Capacity Building — International Dimension

Aspect 2025 2026 Change
Regions & strands Regional + cross-regional Same No change
Global Gateway alignment Not explicit Strand 3 projects in several regions must align with Global Gateway priorities New mandatory condition
Special initiative None specified EU–Moldova Master’s in European Affairs New flagship action

Budget Information

Aspect 2025 2026 Difference
Overall envelope ~€26 billion (2021–2027) Same No change
Legal basis reference Erasmus+ Regulation Erasmus+ Regulation plus EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509 New legal reference added

What This Means for Your 2026 Application

The 2026 Programme Guide represents evolution rather than revolution. The core structure, eligibility rules, and funding logic remain unchanged. The meaningful differences are:

  • Two new political priorities — Union of Skills and EU Preparedness — should be referenced where relevant in your proposal’s priority alignment section
  • Mental health is now explicitly named under inclusion — relevant for youth, education, and VET projects
  • The new European Partnerships for School Development opens a new route for school-focused organisations
  • Capacity Building Strand 3 applicants in certain regions now face a mandatory Global Gateway alignment requirement
  • Erasmus+ Teacher Academies no longer appear as a standalone action line

For KA210 and KA220 applicants — which represent the core of ErasmusForge’s supported actions — the 2026 guide brings no structural changes to eligibility, budget rules, or evaluation criteria. The priority alignment updates are the most relevant consideration for your proposal.

Ready to write your 2026 Erasmus+ proposal?

ErasmusForge is fully aligned with the 2026 Programme Guide — guiding you through every section of your KA210 or KA220 application, step by step, with built-in AI assistance and evaluation scoring.

Start Forging for Free →


About the Author
Petros Konstantas — Erasmus+ Expert & Founder of ErasmusForge. Supporting organisations across Europe with Erasmus+ proposals since 2015.

Scroll to Top